Skip to content

Writing with AI

You can ask Emma to write a document and it will open in the Canvas as a review-only draft. Tell her what you want in plain language — for example “write me an article on diesel intake cleaning”, “draft a landing page for our maintenance service”, or “I need a privacy policy”.

Give Emma the subject, and — if you have it — your own material: notes, a rough draft or source text to build from. She keeps your facts and your intent. Then she reads the project: its pages, its data and its keyword research (your keyword sets and any saved ranking research that matches the subject), and writes to teach the reader rather than to sell. A reviewer checks the draft and it comes back into the Canvas held for your approval — nothing is applied or published until you accept it.

When the run finishes, Emma lists what she wrote from: your material, the page, how many keywords and project data points. If there was no keyword research for the subject, or something could not be read, she says so — she never invents keywords, search volumes or rankings to fill the gap. If Emma can’t write (for example no saved project is open) the panel says why; WordPresto never hands you a placeholder document instead.

Drafting is grounded and governed: Emma writes from the project’s real knowledge, honours the content brief that applies to what she is writing, and never uses the project’s banned terms. Weak or off-topic knowledge is left out rather than stated as fact.

As well as articles and web pages, WordPresto can start a business contract, a CV or résumé and a business report. Each asks the questions that matter for that deliverable — for a contract, what it is for, the parties and the governing jurisdiction; for a CV, your real roles and achievements; for a report, the real data it should draw on.

Every generated draft passes deterministic checks before you review it: it must have a title and proper sections, unresolved placeholders are surfaced, and invented-looking support (a statistic that appears nowhere in your brief, or a testimonial nobody supplied) is flagged. Contracts additionally check that the parties and jurisdiction you named actually appear, and always state that the draft is checked for internal consistency only and is not legal advice — a qualified lawyer should review it. CVs flag any figure that does not trace to what you supplied; reports flag any number that is not in your data.

For legal documents you can add reference material (templates or past contracts) under Project Knowledge as a “reference document”. WordPresto then grounds the draft in that material and tells you honestly whether it was grounded, or that no reference material was found. Grounding is not legal validation.

Asking Emma for a LinkedIn or X post routes to that channel’s persona, so the draft is grounded in your project’s knowledge and your own published posts, respects the channel’s brief and real length limits, and opens in the Canvas as a review-only draft. See “Publishing to social channels” for the full flow.